Botnets threaten the Internet as we know it

Botnets are the biggest threat facing the Internet today and neither education, technology or the police can help, according to experts at the RSA security conference in San Francisco last week.

Ira Winkler, president of the Internet Security Advisors Group, said: "The statistics are basically that we're screwed. There is no real strategy for it. No-one is doing anything."

Winkler said there needs to be a fundamental change in people's attitudes to effectively combat botnets. "It's going to take a lot more than education, technology and law enforcement."

The most effective approach to tackling botnets would be to impose penalties on people who allow their computers to become infected, making users take more responsibility, according to Winkler.

He said: "We need to hold users responsible. ISPs should have a responsibility of making sure users aren't hosting botnets."

The botnet problem is getting worse, with no obvious solution in sight, according to Joe Telafici, vice president of Avert Operation at McAfee.

Telafici said: "The problem today is many orders of magnitude worse [than] last year. If we don't find a way to make it less profitable to do this, it won't go away."

Jordana Siegel, deputy director of outreach and awareness at the National Cyber Security Division of the US Department of Homeland Security, said: "We're seeing a constant increase in malicious code, which includes botnets."

Ronald Teixeira, executive director of the National Cyber Security Alliance, said: "Botnets are, I think, the biggest threat we face on the Internet today. Tackling this is going a long way to limit attacks."

But Matthew Fine, supervisory special agent with the FBI, said the fact that criminals are now going to jail for botnet attacks is a step in the right direction.

"It's sending a message that judges understand this is affecting lives," said Fine.

But more still needs to be done, Fine warned. "I think we're all screaming for help. Hopefully we'll get some updated laws to help us."

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 4 comments

  1. What a joke John -- 15/04/08

    Hold users responsible? What a joke. If someone steals your car and drives it through a crowd of people, the car owner isn't responsible.
    Bot nets will always be around. We have to design technology better to handle possible attacks. Routers should automatically detect attacks from computers and block them. If they are blocked near the start of each computer then it wont spread to be a problem to the destination of the attack. ISP's could then alert the user to a possible misuse of their computer system.

    1. A joke, or a last resort? Anonymous -- 16/04/08

      That would be fine, but if the computer is only one of a botnet of 10 million (Bigger ones do exist for spam mail etc), then it doesn't need to send much traffic to maintain a DDOS attack a single request once every 10-30 seconds. How is a ISP going to resolve that as an attack and act accordingly.

      Its been proven time and time again that building technology to stop them is not an effective solution because it cannot be implemented on enough computers, putting it at an ISP level rapidly slows down the internet, and as soon as an effective measure is implemented someone will crack it.

  2. Botnet herding Anonymous -- 17/04/08

    Whilst Linux and OSX are not bullet-proof, moving away from Microsoft operating systems and applications (Internet Explorer, Office, etc) would be a start.

    Corporates are well protected its the mum and dads at home that we need to get off MS. They are by far the more common ones to be attacked as they are less likely to use and update a/v and a/s software and firewalls, and they are more likely to visit dodgy or compromised websites.

    Doing that would greatly reduce the incidences of botnets.

    Hamish

    1. why penalize endusers? Anonymous -- 23/04/08

      software is probably the most common commodity that is traded without warranty(e.g. EULA Licensing, etc.)
      If it were like appliance or other services it will have warranty or at least consumers guarantee act.
      But for software its clealy one-sided to the manufacturers favor.
      Why penalize consumers.
      If it is an Automobile without adequate safety features, Do we penalize buyers or manufacturers?
      Have everyone read Bruce Schneier comments
      and Kaspersky!

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

  • Renai LeMay Australian Govt funds IT start-ups
    This week Australia's Federal Government announced it had allocated $3.6 million in funding to 57 local research projects so that they could be commercialised, with many of them being web or IT-related start-ups.
  • Array Google should come clean on datacentres
    It's nice that Google says it has put an effort into making its datacentres more energy efficient, but the search giant's pledges won't mean much until it discloses just how many of the beasties it's actually running.
  • Array US shows what OPEL could have been
    Sprint's WiMAX roll-out in Baltimore will prove the Australian government's decision to worm its way out of the Opel WiMAX contract was a short-sighted, and ultimately damaging, political stunt that has benefited nobody.
  • More blogs »

Tags

Back to top

Featured