Rural broadband: Govt wants you to have your say

Despite fears the Australian Broadband Guarantee (ABG) might be axed, the Rudd government has approved the subsidy for Australia's most remote Internet users for one more year.

Last month, Opposition communications spokesperson Bruce Billson called on the Labor government to reveal its stance on the ABG — a Howard government initiative which subsidises the cost of Internet access for rural and regional Australians.

"Labor's studied position of silence on this issue is quite worrying. We're already seeing that some service providers are getting less than encouraging responses from the government with regards to their ABG funding," Billson said last month.

However, tender documents for Australia's upcoming fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) network, released on Friday, reveal that funding has been extended for the 2008-2009 financial year at a cost of AU$95 million.

The government is also interested in policy and funding initiatives to provide "affordable access" to broadband services to those outside the national broadband network's coverage and is asking for those planning to provide services to the two percent of the population not covered by the FTTN network to make submissions in a parallel process.

"This process will explore long-term options that ensure rural and remote areas of Australia have access to the best available broadband services through future-proof telecommunications infrastructure. This could include enhancing the Australian Broadband Guarantee program to achieve outcomes comparable to the [FTTN network]," Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said in a statement.

The government is asking for submissions from "industry, public interest groups and other stakeholders" and will help inform a report by the Regional Telecommunications Independent Review Committee, due in August, on ways to improve broadband for bush users. Submissions should be sent to remotebroadband@dbcde.gov.au by 30 June.

The funding guarantee comes after several rural Internet service providers told ZDNet.com.au last month that they believed the Rudd government was unlikely to axe the scheme.

"There's always going to be a need for some kind of subsidised services like this, it'd be a bit silly to cut funding of any kind before the rollout of anything else, which is at least a couple of years away," a spokesperson for regional broadband provider Bordernet said.

ZDNet.com.au's Marcus Browne contributed to this report.

Like this article? Click below to send it to your mobile for free!

Talkback 6 comments

  1. The Labor trend setters Lord Watchdog -- 15/04/08

    The quickest way to get something decent in this country is to tell the Government that we don't want it.

    Labor hasn't constructed one piece of infrastructure in NSW since they took office in 1995 that doesn't attract a toll or other fee for use. I've no doubt that this trend will carry over to the KRudd regime at a national level.

    When they finally decide on how to go about building the new broadband network, assuming they honour the promise in the first place, the chances of Telstra building it and being able to dominate the Internet industry again with their extorionate pricing and regulation regime are quite high.

    Standby for the big sellout from KRudd, CONroy and their American mates at Telstra.

    1. Winners are grinners. Sydney Lawrence -- 15/04/08

      Take it easy Lord Watchdog have a powder and go and have a good lie down.

      I know things have not been going to your liking lately but you win some and loose some.

      However standby for the Rudd/Conroy Broadband System that will prove to be a world-beater and built and delivered in record time. As Bob Dylan once said "the times they are a'changing".

  2. Shortsighted Vision with wrong prescription glasses. Anonymous -- 15/04/08

    All vision very little substance. The primary issue I have is that any nationwide broadband roll-out program MUST also result in additional fibre trunks.

    Currently the two international fibre trunks operated by Telstra and Optus are seriously congested. Any investment in a nationwide broadband roll-out should conversely result in an investment in additional fibre trunks.

    I see nothing in the governments proposals that would enable this to happen.

    I might be able to access the nine network's website at 24mb/s, but most internet content is ourced outside Australia where I'm lucky if I can stay connected to a server.

  3. Rural Broadband What Is It? Anonymous -- 20/04/08

    Ahem what about copperwire upgrade for just those whom live within a few ks of the exchange.ABG sucks way too expensive,sat bb is not comparable to city users its 3 times more at a miserable speed.
    The same problem exists with the 3G network its for Yuppies only who gives a rats bum for interenet access on a moblie ph when u live in a more rural area anyway.It dont work anyway so u rely on dial up hahaha.

    It work too but slow,at least the landline works if nothing else.

    Privatisation of Telstra Sucks as do the shareholders for looking for a quick buck at taxpayers expense .

    Wayne Bunbury
    Now a new owner of suck shite 3g mobile ph and still dreams of me u beut CDMA that worked with no frills attached,

    1. Sat. poor excuse for broadband in rural areas Lyn Booth -- 09/06/08

      I have to agree that sat. broadband is IN NO WAY COMPARABLE TO ADSL!! in speed or in price. The Govt actively encouraged companies that are basically twobit flyby nighters that would not exist if it were not for the BB guarantee. We are on a pair gains system just outside Taree (6kms)on the Mid North Coast of NSW. When it rains we often have no phone and dialup if any at 14.4kbps. Third world service at prices that city dwellers can't believe. Using wireless on the Telstra network is just not affordable - the plans need to be seen to be believed - such low download limits and high $$ fees with excess charges that are through the roof. We have written to the telecommunications enquiry, hammered all the local pollies and Telstra but it is of no use. It hurts to see adverts for deals offering fast BB, GB's of downloads and less than to cost i would pay for satellite. I refuse to give tax payers $$ to a technology that is fundamentally flawed. I see that my only hope is that the Rudd govt comes to it's senses and realises that communications need to improve for us fringe dwellers. Meanwhile back to smoke signals and cooeeeing from the hills!

  4. RTIRC - Is the 2% represented? Nigel Holloway -- 21/05/08

    Committees tend to be a Bureaucratic waste of time. This one is unlikely to have any experience or knowledge of the plight od the "2%". The big surprise will probably be that they don't live in "communities".
    No matter what they come up with there is nothing to suggest users such as myself will EVER gain access to broadband at a realistic price.
    I moved to the country knowing I would rely on satellite internet access but have found it to be not only expensive (which I expected) but usually little better than dial-up. As my 18 month contract for satellite costs seven times the cost of dial-up (which I maintained anyway to cover satellite virtual stoppages which occur after 4pm and on weekends and public holidays) I have reverted to dial-up.

    I'm 15 minutes drive from the nearest population centre (quite small) so cannot get ADSL and am unlikely to gain access to local wireless, cable or fibre facilities should they ever reach there.

    My only other option is Telstra Wireless. At about 4 times the cost of wireless access provided by other suppliers in less rural areas I am unfairly penalised (like so many others).

    The only realistic options I can see are for a direct government subsidy to users in the short to medium term and a subsidy to a willing Telstra competitor to redress the problem long term.

    A "Benevolent Dictator" is more likely to do the obvious than a "Committee".

Add your opinion


Sponsored content

Power Centre - Content from our premier sponsors

Blogs

Tags

Back to top

Featured